In a broad sense, AI in parliaments should be viewed as an eliminator of human errors and a vehicle for automatization. It could (and should) enable offices of parliaments and even elected members of parliaments to find inconsistencies and deficiencies in their work, as well as spot conflicts between new initiatives, proposals, or documentation and existing law, documents, or rules of operation without the need of painstaking human cognitive processes. Also, much of the work in the offices of parliaments could at least be speeded up by partly automating portions of tasks various departments face, especially the tedious and/or low-value parts of those tasks. More optimistically, AI (agents) could double or even partly replace some costly deliberations by simulating democratic or administrative debates on even the most minor topics, for which real public consultations would not be worth the cost or effort.
